Electricians: We must fight tooth and nail against the attacks

The TEEU applied for a variation of the Registered Employment Agreement in order to implement the increase in the rate of pay for electricians in the building industry that was agreed after the week long strike in mid 2009. Yet again, on 19 February last, the Labour Court adjourned a decision on the matter.

The TEEU applied for a variation of the Registered Employment Agreement in order to implement the increase in the rate of pay for electricians in the building industry that was agreed after the week long strike in mid 2009. Yet again, on 19 February last, the Labour Court adjourned a decision on the matter.
The Electrical Contractors Association, which represents the larger employers, has now withdrawn its support for the increase. An initial report from the commission set up by the Tanaiste, Mary Coughlan, to enquire into the causes of the dispute has  was circulated. Its recommendations were extremely unfavourable to workers in electrical contracting. Amongst the possibilities raised is the division of electricians into categories within the industry. This would result in deskilling within the trade and a devaluation of the labour of electricians. It also raised that different rates of pay could be determined by the size of the employing companies. Such a move would accelerate the use of subcontractors, which has already had a disastrous effect on pay and conditions.
The TEEU has rejected the initial report but it is clear that some see the compliance mechanisms mentioned in the report as a positive. This parallels attitudes of other officials in the construction sector, who talk quite openly of the inevitability of acceptance of lower rates and conditions in the industry. They say that an “official compliance agreement” will ensure that these rates and conditions will be easier to enforce. The main carrot for them is that acceptance of these “official conditions” would probably include compulsory trade union membership and “deduction at source”. This would make life very easy for them, regardless of the situation for their members on the ground.
The union movement must use every sinew to fight to maintain wages and conditions. The biggest gain from the electricians strike last year was the defeat of the employers’ proposal for a 10% pay cut. We must fight tooth and nail to defeat every further proposed cut.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Capitalism: A Love Story - A raging indictment of US capitalism!

Next Article

Lidl profit & exploitation

Related Posts

DELL – workers win increased redundancy

By Conor Payne

A MONTH after announcing 1,900 redundancies in Limerick, Dell has been forced to make important concessions to workers. Workers have succeeded in forcing the company to provide a better redundancy package, increasing the cap from 52 to 104 weeks pay and improving the pay rates in the package, which previously covered only basic pay.

ICTU’s 10 Point Plan: Is it fairer or better?

By Kevin McLoughlin

ICTU’s PLAN was to threaten a national strike on 30 March in the hope of forcing new negotiations around their 10 point so-called social solidarity programme There is a better, fairer way.

ICTU’s social solidarity programme relates to jobs, unemployment, pay and the banks. It says those who lose their jobs should be kept at 80% of their earnings for two years, via social welfare, on condition that they go on retraining. It also says bosses should resist lay-offs, and instead consider cutting the working week.

Read More

Labour Court – a sorry joke for workers

After the experience in recent years of Labour Court recommendations for enhanced redundancy or improved conditions being ignored by employers in cases such as Vita Cortex, Carroll’s Joinery, Coca Cola serious questions are being asked by workers about what if anything is this government prepared to do to protect workers' rights.