Why is Big Business showering Sinn Féin with money?

By Manus Lenihan

Last November, Friends of Sinn Féin held a dinner at the fanciest hotel in Manhattan, raising $350,000. The image of stinking-rich people dining in the Times Square Sheraton, each forking out thousands to Sinn Féin, doesn’t sit well with the left-wing, “champion of the people” image that Adams and co were acting out at their Ard Fheis.

But it’s nothing out of the ordinary. In the last 20 years Sinn Féin has raised over $12 million (€10.7 million) in the US. Of the top ten biggest donors, nine are construction company bosses, top executives and Wall Street gamblers.

Who funds Sinn Féin?

Just as working-class people tend to support higher wages, more funding for services and higher taxes on the rich, so big business owners obviously tend to support the policies that work in their interests: privatisation, cutbacks, layoffs, deregulation and corporate welfare. Bosses who are overflowing with sentimental feelings about the country their great-grandfather was born in are no exception.

This point is very important because we’re not talking about some isolated eccentrics here. Some of the biggest companies in the US, including what must be a sizeable chunk of the New York construction industry, are showering gold upon Sinn Féin. They have confidence that Adams and co, behind the rhetoric, represent their interests, not ours.

The fact that Sinn Féin also got a fraction of the money from some US trade unions doesn’t prove anything. We know from bitter experience how the SIPTU bureaucracy stood by the Labour Party through year after year of attacks on workers.

“Too left wing for their tastes”

What Sinn Féin say to the plutocrats they want money from is most likely very different from what they say to the working class people they want votes from. Like a scene from a comedy, these two worlds collided recently when Adams, McDonald and others met with some of the party’s American donors who were concerned that its policies might be too left-wing for their tastes.

I would have given a lot of money – a donation of Sinn Féin proportions – to have been a fly on the wall listening to Adams and co soothing the worries of these bosses. I don’t know what they told them, but it worked; the bosses seem to have left the meeting satisfied. Either Sinn Féin turned a gang of hardened Wall Street traders into anti-austerity firebrands in the course of a two-hour presentation, or else they convinced them that Sinn Féin is really on their side.

 

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Joe Higgins on SIPTU's support for Sinn Fein

Next Article

Government must ban home repossessions by banks

Related Posts
Read More

The Socialist Party & the political position & operation of the ULA

The Socialist Party initiated the United Left Alliance along with the Workers and Unemployed Action Group (WUAG) and the People Before Profit Alliance (PBPA), just over two years ago. In recent months the problem of the ULA’s slow progress has been added to by important political mistakes and the withdrawal of WUAG. Now, as things stand, the Socialist Party has major differences with the position adopted by others in the United Left Alliance on a number of important political issues, and on the operation of the ULA itself. This article will outline some of the issues.