Elect union officials – IMPACT general secretary appointed to €170k+ job!

Peter McLoone, the disgraced General Secretary of IMPACT will retire from his position in May.  McLoone’s replacement, chosen by IMPACT’s central executive committee, is Shay Cody.

Peter McLoone, the disgraced General Secretary of IMPACT will retire from his position in May.  McLoone’s replacement, chosen by IMPACT’s central executive committee, is Shay Cody.

As Shay Cody has served as the Deputy General Secretary since 1997, this would indicate that it will be “business as usual” in the leadership of IMPACT. Shay Cody’s wage as general secretary is over €170,000 a year!

The selection process for this senior trade union position gives a clear indication of what is wrong at the heart of the trade union movement. There is a fundamental democratic deficit in this process, where people are appointed to powerful positions within the union with no input whatsoever from the membership.

To address this issue, members of the Dublin City Branch put forward motions to their AGM calling for the election of IMPACT full time officials. However the motions were ruled out of order as they supposedly contravene the union rules.
It is completely undemocratic that members of a trade union cannot discuss and debate the processes involved in the appointment of their employees, or discuss and debate the wages they are paid.

The Socialist Party believes that trade union full time officials should be elected, subject to recall by the membership and paid the average wage of the members they represent. This is essential if trade union officials are to be democratically accountable. Full time officials must also have lifestyles comparable to the workers they are representing. Clearly it is impossible for a trade union official on over €170,000 to have any real understanding of the problems facing low and middle income IMPACT members.

Members of IMPACT who want real change within their union should come together to organise an opposition to the pro-social partnership and ineffectual leadership that dominates the union and campaign to get the union rules changed to make the full time officials accountable.

Previous Article

Opposition to library closures mounts

Next Article

Iraq 7 years on: The slaughter continues

Related Posts

ICTU’s 10 Point Plan: Is it fairer or better?

By Kevin McLoughlin

ICTU’s PLAN was to threaten a national strike on 30 March in the hope of forcing new negotiations around their 10 point so-called social solidarity programme There is a better, fairer way.

ICTU’s social solidarity programme relates to jobs, unemployment, pay and the banks. It says those who lose their jobs should be kept at 80% of their earnings for two years, via social welfare, on condition that they go on retraining. It also says bosses should resist lay-offs, and instead consider cutting the working week.

Read More

Lidl profit & exploitation

In the current economic climate it seems those of us lucky enough to have a low-paid job have forfeited our right to respect and decent treatment.  With hundreds of thousands on the live register at the moment, it's an employers' market. The employed are feeling the pressure of thousands in the queue behind them, and the pressure of employers trying to cut down on costs.

Unemployment Crisis – Organise to Defend Jobs

By Ray McLoughlin

BAUSCH AND Lomb – 200, KPMG – 200, lay offs in the first week of March continue the disastrous pattern of job losses in Ireland. Over 300 people were made redundant each working day in February in the South, 63,198 signed on the dole in the first two months of 2009! Unemployment is skyrocketing towards 500,000.

Redundancies are happening in all sectors, light engineering, construction, financial services. Further job losses are being proposed in transport, education and across the public services. Workers are looking into a black abyss of job losses, with all the consequent hardships and uncertainties facing them and their families? What leadership are the trade union leaders giving to the victims of this failure of capitalism?