Outrage from below at IBSA forces action

By Aislinn O’Keeffe

Legislation designed to outlaw image based sexual abuse (IBSA), often referred to as ‘revenge porn’, will go before the Justice Committee this Tuesday 1 December. While this is a welcome move, it is long overdue. Campaigners have been pushing for this change for several years including former Solidarity TD and Socialist Party member Ruth Coppinger who raised the issue in the Dáil as far back as 2017.

No knowledge or consent

The sudden decision to deal with this issue comes on the back of huge public outrage after it became known that thousands of explicit images and videos of girls and women had been shared online without their consent by a group of five hundred men. It was reported that these images were stolen from apps such as Only Fans and Tinder, were images that were shared privately and in confidence, or were images taken without the knowledge or consent of the victim.

The five hundred men in question went to considerable lengths to set up a Discord group and to share and collate these images, with some reports stating that images and videos had been arranged according to the county that the victims reside in. These are men who live, work, study and enter relationships with women, and see no issue in betraying the trust of the girls and women that they encounter and reducing them to the status of objects.

With a proliferation of free porn widely available and easily accessible online, what are the motivations for the continuing occurrence of IBSA? In a 2019 submission to the Joint Committee on Justice and Equality, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) states that IBSA is widespread and perpetrators can be former or current intimate partners, acquaintances, or online trolls. They also state that “the motivation behind gendered online harassment, in general, is to violate a person’s personal autonomy, dignity, and privacy in a sexualised way”.

Sense of entitlement

We live in society that creates a culture where boys and men are taught that they have an entitlement to the bodies of women and girls from a young age. Where is this entitlement learned? In the last number of weeks, we were reminded of the long history in Ireland of church and state entitlement and control over women’s bodies with the attempt to seal Mother and Baby Home records. The Irish church/state alliance exerted control over women and girls by incarcerating them in institutions for perceived infractions of patriarchal order. The current Fine Gael/Fianna Fail/Green Party government sought to continue to exert this control through an attempt to deny survivors access to the information gathered by the Mother and Baby Homes Commission of Investigation. National outrage over this move forced the government to eventually back down.

Sexist notions can also be disseminated by schools as we witnessed last week when a school in Carlow reportedly told female students that they were not to wear clothing that ‘showed off’ the ‘female anatomy’ and that could prove distracting to male teachers. The principal was quick to deny this in media interviews, but the reality is that the story received such an echo because it mirrors the experiences of girls in schools across the country. The dangerous implication is that teenage girls are somehow responsible for the thoughts and actions of adult men. 

Equally, that there is something inherently sexual about girls’ bodies which amounts to an insidious form of victim blaming often used in the justice system and wider society against victims and survivors of sexual abuse. This latest event caused another huge public backlash and the school in question was forced to come out and deny this version of events. Students in the school organised a petition (which at the time of writing has received almost 14,000 signatures) and some of the boys in the school wore skirts to school in an amazing act of solidarity.

Sexist ideology and the system

Sexist ideology and the sense of entitlement to girl’s and women’s bodies is transmitted through all of the institutions of capitalism from church and state, to the education system, social media and mass media. This ideology is so ingrained and omnipresent that it has become naturalised. If the last number of weeks have taught us anything, it is that these powerful institutions of capitalism can exert inordinate and oppressive control over the lives of the working class. 

However, we have also learned that when the masses come together and express their outrage through the organisation that we have seen, these behemoths can be forced to retreat. When the working class organises collectively society is transformed.

Sign the petition here:

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Review: The Return of Nature

Next Article

US- Kshama Solidarity campaign launched to oppose right wing recall

Related Posts
Read More

Nestle clarification

The Socialist Party received the attached letter from Nestlé complaining about the Socialist Party's use of their copyrighted logo (for which we did not seek their permission) on our poster concerning the issue of workers' rights.

The use of the logo and that of other high profile multinationals to replace the stars on the EU flag was designed to convey our view that the EU is run primarily in the interests of the multinational corporations.

However, as can be seen from the Nestlé letter, they fear that the appearance of their logo conveys the notion that the Socialist Party's No to Lisbon campaign is supported by Nestlé!

The Socialist Party is more than happy to clarify publically to anybody who thinks otherwise from viewing the poster that Nestlé do not support the objectives of the Socialist Party.