Why we need a national health service

By Diana O’Dwyer

In announcing the nurses’ overwhelming decision to strike, INMO President, Martina Harkin-Kelly said: “We’re standing up for safe staffing, fair pay, and for our patients, who deserve better care”. Decades of under-resourcing, compounded by austerity since the crash, have left us with 2,000 fewer nurses than in 2007 and less than two-thirds of the recommended number of hospital consultants. As with nurses, recruitment and retention of doctors and other healthcare professionals is difficult due to increasingly intolerable working conditions. The nurses’ strike is therefore a strike not just for nurses but for all public healthcare workers.

Eleven billion in austerity cutbacks from 2009 -2017 have reinforced the two-tier system nature of the Irish health service. Public hospitals have been forced into financial dependence on income from private patients, allowed to jump the queue ahead of poorer, sicker patients. Even when public patients finally access treatment, the care they receive is generally inferior.

Waiting list & rising costs

Health expert, Maev-Ann Wren, has explained that consultants “have an economic incentive to favour private patients, which contributes to public patient waiting lists and leaves much of public patient care in the hands of poorly supervised and trained junior doctors”. Aside from the appalling injustice of this, it means delaying treatment of public patients until they are sicker and treatment is costlier. It is one of the main causes of the one million people on public waiting lists and rising healthcare costs.

Unlike the consultant and GP organisations, which have historically blocked the introduction of free universal healthcare due to their economic interest in fee income from private patients, the INMO calls for “a free single-tiered, universally accessible, public health service where access is determined solely by need and not by ability to pay” and for all health professionals, including GPs, to be directly employed by the state. The nurses’ strike is therefore a strike for everyone who depends on the public health service – and for all workers crippled by the cost of private health insurance.

What kind of public system?

The Socialist Party supports the INMO demand for a universal free and fully public health service but would go further. An Irish National Health System must also be secular. This means separating church and state: voluntary hospitals and other healthcare organisations must be freed from religious influence and along with the rest of the health service should be democratically run by workers and patients’ representatives rather than unaccountable managers.

To enable optimal use of resources, private hospitals and healthcare companies must also be taken into public ownership. Public/private healthcare apartheid exists not only in the private ward in the public hospital but in the 21 private hospitals that account for one in six acute hospital beds yet deny them to the sickest patients. Another particularly striking example is the profit-hungry pharmaceutical companies that invent lifesaving drugs but price them out of reach of those who need them.

Socialist Party stands for:
–    Immediate reversal of all austerity measures
–    Pay restoration – no to two tier pay
–    A living wage for all – Wage increases in line with increases of the cost of living
–    End the outsourcing of jobs in the health service – for all staff to be directly employed
–    For a fully funded national public health service free at the point of use
–    Take all private hospitals, pharmaceutical and healthcare companies out of hands of profiteers by putting them into democratic public ownership.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Environmental destruction: “We should change the system itself”

Next Article

The Chavista movement & the struggle for socialist change

Related Posts
Read More

The Socialist Party & the political position & operation of the ULA

The Socialist Party initiated the United Left Alliance along with the Workers and Unemployed Action Group (WUAG) and the People Before Profit Alliance (PBPA), just over two years ago. In recent months the problem of the ULA’s slow progress has been added to by important political mistakes and the withdrawal of WUAG. Now, as things stand, the Socialist Party has major differences with the position adopted by others in the United Left Alliance on a number of important political issues, and on the operation of the ULA itself. This article will outline some of the issues.

Read More

Labour right to be in a panic over Water Tax as electoral slaughter looms

The Labour Party is in an obvious panic over water charges looming large as the Local and European Elections approach. They are right to be. Labour's infamous 'Tesco' Ad during the 2011 General Election Campaign specifically named a Fine Gael water tax of €238 per annum as one of the key things they would stop if in government. Their betrayal on this will cost them dear.