Socialist Party on the draft X Case Bill

The Draft Bill legislating for X case is designed to placate reactionary elements of Fine Gael and seeks to criminalise and punish women in crisis pregnancies. The pro-choice movement must mobilise to exert maximum pressure on the government to remove the worst provisions in the draft and maintain the fight for a referendum to repeal eighth amendment.

The Draft Bill legislating for X case is designed to placate reactionary elements of Fine Gael and seeks to criminalise and punish women in crisis pregnancies. The pro-choice movement must mobilise to exert maximum pressure on the government to remove the worst provisions in the draft and maintain the fight for a referendum to repeal eighth amendment.

Responding to the publication this week of the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Bill 2013 Joe Higgins TD said:

“This draft is rightly being met with disappointment, anger and incredulity by people who hoped and expected that the government would be forced by the circumstances of the death of Savita Halappanavar and the resulting movement of people for change to come up with legislation that would make a real difference for women in this country. Even the belated report of the expert group, while minimal, advocated what would have been a minor step forward from the current situation.

“However the draft contains a number of provisions, omissions and formulations that are completely objectionable and will have to be taken up in the legislative debate and by the pro choice movement outside the Dáil.

“Specifically the draft provides for too many specialists having an say over the woman’s choice and too high a threshold of unanimity especially in the case for suicide.

“The draft legislation makes no consideration for the health and well being of the woman and instead provides that a termination can only be considered when death enters the equation. This is extremely reckless and a contributory factor to the death of Savita. There is no consideration for terminations in the case of rape, incest and fatal foetal abnormalities where that would be sought by the woman for the good of her own well being.

“Finally the provision of 14 year sentence for contravening these proposed laws is an absolute outrage. Without these glaring deficiencies being addressed there is a real question mark as to whether somebody who is pro-choice can regard what is on offer from the government as truly a step forward.”

Socialist Party Councillor and pro-choice activist Councillor Ruth Coppinger said:

“As we predicted in the aftermath of the death of Savita Halappanavar the government’s strategy was to wait for the immediate wave of anger and revulsion among the majority of Irish society to abate and then come up with a wording that in the Taoiseach’s own words does not fundamentally alter the current legal situation.

“The obstacles that have been placed in front of women seeking an abortion on psychological grounds can only serve to add to their distress and in reality are designed in such a way that most women in that situation would opt to go to Britain if they can afford it.

“The proposed maximum 14 year jail sentence in section 19 of the draft bill if the woman obtained an abortion in Ireland in contravention of the law, whether by abortion pills ordered online or some other means, while at the same time section 13 affirms the right to travel and access information about abortion services abroad serves to enshrine in legislation the gross hypocrisy of the Irish solution to an Irish problem.”

Paul Murphy MEP concluded:

“It is very unfortunate that given the clear shift in wider Irish society as evidenced by opinion polls and the mobilisations by the pro-choice movement that the national debate in media and political circles is being consciously narrowed around the question of suicide.

“There is now a need to mobilise massive political pressure from below on the political establishment to force the radical amending of the government draft into something that really protects the lives of women and beyond that the naming of a date for a referendum to appeal the eighth amendment as a necessary step in permitting real choice for Irish women.”

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Bangladesh building collapse - casualties of a rotten profit system

Next Article

What lies behind Direct Democracy Ireland?

Related Posts
Read More

Review: Living Dolls: The Return of Sexism By Natasha Walter

Henrik Ibsen’s 1879 play, A Doll’s House was greeted by a storm of outcry and controversy when it was first staged. In A Doll’s House, the protagonist Nora, a housewife and mother, comes to the realisation that she has never been able to develop as a human being as she’s been constrained by being seen and treated as a little more than a sweet little doll, initially by her father and subsequently by her husband. The play ends with Nora deciding that the only way she can grow as a human being and break free of the social constraints objectifying her, is for her to leave the family home, including her children.

Read More

LGBTQ liberation in the US – more than putting a ring on it

Forty-four years ago at a gay bar in New York City’s Greenwich Village, a group of transsexuals, cross-dressers, drag queens, lesbians, and gay men fought back against their constant persecution by the New York Police Department and inadvertently started the modern fight for gay liberation. They would not believe the progress that queer people have made in the last 44 years!

Read More

No tolerance for racist bigotry

The issue of racism has reared its ugly head as it recently made news headlines. The conviction of Stephen Lawrence’s killers gave us a sinister reminder of the worst consequences of racism. Just as with the brutal murder of Toyosi Shittabey in 2010, we must use these incidents as a wake-up call to stamp out the possibility of such horrific tragedies happening.